Estimation of thermal comfort by physical variable of the thermal environment: A study in open spaces at UABC-Sauzal, Mexico

Estimation of thermal comfort by physical variable of the thermal environment: A study in open spaces at UABC-Sauzal, Mexico

Thermal comfort in outdoor spaces is an essential characteristic for the urban environment quality; in addition, it can significantly influence the performance, well-being, comfort and thermal sensation of people. Therefore, the design of outdoor spaces must consider the thermal comfort ranges in re...

全面介绍

Guardado en:
书目详细资料
Autores principales: López Cañedo, Jessica Yukie, Rincón-Martínez , Julio César, Fernández Melchor, Francisco
格式: Online
语言:spa
出版: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2021
在线阅读:https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/recit_67
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
实物特征
总结:Thermal comfort in outdoor spaces is an essential characteristic for the urban environment quality; in addition, it can significantly influence the performance, well-being, comfort and thermal sensation of people. Therefore, the design of outdoor spaces must consider the thermal comfort ranges in response to the environment conditions in order to promote their frequent and healthy use. The main objective of this work was to estimate the thermal comfort ranges for outdoor public spaces from the adaptive approach and each of the physical variables of the thermal environment. The study was carried out in Ensenada city during the warm period. The evaluations, questionnaire and physical measurement instruments attended what is suggested in the ANSI/ASHRAE 55, ISO 10551 and ISO 7726. The analysis was carried out with the correlation of the registered physical variables and the perceived thermal sensation from two univariate statistical methods: Averages by Thermal Sensation Intervals and Simple Linear Regression. The comfort ranges for the temperature were 19,2 to 25,1 °C and 20,1 to 23,8 °C; for relative humidity were 54,3 to 83,6 % and from 0,01 to 99,9 %; and, for wind speed were 0,1 to 2,6 m/s and 0,1 to 5,9 m/s, respectively. The values obtained with the first analysis method showed greater consistency with respect to the real evaluation conditions.

相似书籍