Power and vulnerability in peer reviewed evaluation for scholarly journals
In this paper we analyze peer review evaluations for scholarly journal as power mechanisms. To reach this aim we propose that what is in fact published represents viability, reliability and adaptability in relation to scientific knowledge (and their believes, values and traditions). However, when pa...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | http://culturales.uabc.mx/index.php/Culturales/article/view/580 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | In this paper we analyze peer review evaluations for scholarly journal as power mechanisms. To reach this aim we propose that what is in fact published represents viability, reliability and adaptability in relation to scientific knowledge (and their believes, values and traditions). However, when participation mechanisms are not clear or are manipulated to favor some participants, such intellectual traditions are violated. Our analysis focuses is some mechanisms, so it leaves aside other knowledge and practices of authors and peer-reviewers. Even so, we believe this exercise is worthy given the scientific authority conferred to knowledge defined as publishable, not only because this is how knowledge fields are produced, but also because this creates cultural practices for science production participants as well as for the societies that are informed by this knowledge. |
|---|
@UABCInstitucional
UABC_Oficial
@UABC_Oficial
Tel: +52 686 551 82 00
cienciaabierta@uabc.edu.mx