Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures

Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures

In this work, the analysis and comparison of results reported in the literature from 1987 to 2023 related to the specific energy absorption capacity of tubular columns of composite materials is presented. These materials were classified into three categories: a) Laminates with fibers in [0,90] orien...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Autors principals: De Jesús-Ramírez, María Fernanda, Abúndez-Pliego, Arturo, Alcudia-Zacarías, Enrique, Paz-González, Juan Antonio, Blanco-Figueroa, Salomón
Format: Online
Idioma:spa
Publicat: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2024
Accés en línia:https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/343
Etiquetes: Afegir etiqueta
Sense etiquetes, Sigues el primer a etiquetar aquest registre!
id recit-article-343
record_format ojs
spelling recit-article-3432024-03-22T12:45:40Z Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures Una Revisión comparativa de la capacidad de absorción de energía mecánica de estructuras tubulares compuestas De Jesús-Ramírez, María Fernanda Abúndez-Pliego, Arturo Alcudia-Zacarías, Enrique Paz-González, Juan Antonio Blanco-Figueroa, Salomón Configuraciones de laminado Orientación de la fibra Materiales compuestos Comparación de datos Normativas Estándares Laminate configurations Fiber orientation Composite materials Data comparison Regulations Standards In this work, the analysis and comparison of results reported in the literature from 1987 to 2023 related to the specific energy absorption capacity of tubular columns of composite materials is presented. These materials were classified into three categories: a) Laminates with fibers in [0,90] orientation, b) Laminates with unidirectional fibers, and c) Laminates with multidirectional fibers. Specific energy absorption (SEA) was examined, and comparisons were made among the studies. The results exhibited a wide data scattering, even for quite similar configurations. Differences are attributed to factors such as specimen dimensions, constituent materials, and testing techniques. Additionally, a lack of standardized regulations was observed, hindering the comparison and identification of consistent patterns. It is concluded that the implementation of unified standards would enhance the coherence and comparability of results, providing a deeper understanding of these materials for future applications. En esta investigación se presenta el análisis y comparación de los resultados reportados en la literatura de 1987 al 2023 relacionados con la capacidad de absorción de energía específica de columnas tubulares de materiales compuestos, los cuales se clasificaron en tres categorías: a) laminados con fibras en orientación de [0,90], b) laminados con fibras unidireccionales, y 3) laminados con laminados multidireccionales. Se examinó la absorción de energía específica (SEA) y se realizaron comparaciones entre los estudios. Los resultados exhibieron una amplia dispersión en los datos, incluso para configuraciones aparentemente similares. Las diferencias se atribuyen a factores como dimensiones de probetas, materiales utilizados y técnicas de ensayo. Además, se observó la falta de normativas estandarizadas, lo que dificulta la comparación y la identificación de patrones consistentes. Se concluye que la implementación de estándares unificados mejoraría la coherencia y comparabilidad de los resultados, proporcionando una comprensión más profunda de estos materiales en aplicaciones futuras. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2024-03-19 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/zip https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/343 10.37636/recit.v7n1e343 REVISTA DE CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): January-March; e343 REVISTA DE CIENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero-Marzo; e343 2594-1925 spa https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/343/549 https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/343/550 https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/343/551 Copyright (c) 2024 María Fernanda De Jesús-Ramírez, Arturo Abúndez-Pliego, Enrique Alcudia-Zacarías, Juan Antonio Paz-González, Salomón Blanco-Figueroa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
institution RECIT
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author De Jesús-Ramírez, María Fernanda
Abúndez-Pliego, Arturo
Alcudia-Zacarías, Enrique
Paz-González, Juan Antonio
Blanco-Figueroa, Salomón
spellingShingle De Jesús-Ramírez, María Fernanda
Abúndez-Pliego, Arturo
Alcudia-Zacarías, Enrique
Paz-González, Juan Antonio
Blanco-Figueroa, Salomón
Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
author_facet De Jesús-Ramírez, María Fernanda
Abúndez-Pliego, Arturo
Alcudia-Zacarías, Enrique
Paz-González, Juan Antonio
Blanco-Figueroa, Salomón
author_sort De Jesús-Ramírez, María Fernanda
title Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
title_short Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
title_full Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
title_fullStr Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
title_sort comparative review of the mechanical energy absorption capacity of composite tubular structures
description In this work, the analysis and comparison of results reported in the literature from 1987 to 2023 related to the specific energy absorption capacity of tubular columns of composite materials is presented. These materials were classified into three categories: a) Laminates with fibers in [0,90] orientation, b) Laminates with unidirectional fibers, and c) Laminates with multidirectional fibers. Specific energy absorption (SEA) was examined, and comparisons were made among the studies. The results exhibited a wide data scattering, even for quite similar configurations. Differences are attributed to factors such as specimen dimensions, constituent materials, and testing techniques. Additionally, a lack of standardized regulations was observed, hindering the comparison and identification of consistent patterns. It is concluded that the implementation of unified standards would enhance the coherence and comparability of results, providing a deeper understanding of these materials for future applications.
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
publishDate 2024
url https://recit.uabc.mx/index.php/revista/article/view/343
_version_ 1797332407061315584

Ítems similars