From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico

From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico

This paper presents an analysis of the results of a survey on the best universities for the 2006-2007 years, of 15 different careers in 56 universities of two states of the Mexican Republic, the Distrito Federal (Federal District) and the Estado de Mexico (State of Mexico), published by the Mexi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estrada Peredo, Nancy Gladys, De la Paz Ortega, Manuel, Gil Antón, Manuel
Formato: Online
Lenguaje:spa
eng
Publicado: REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2007
Acceso en línea:https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id redie-article-162
record_format ojs
spelling redie-article-1622017-04-19T01:06:39Z From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico De “¿cuál te pinta mejor?” a “¿para cuál te alcanza?”: desigualdad e inequidad social en el acceso a la educación superior en México Estrada Peredo, Nancy Gladys De la Paz Ortega, Manuel Gil Antón, Manuel Equal education universities. Equidad educativa universidades. This paper presents an analysis of the results of a survey on the best universities for the 2006-2007 years, of 15 different careers in 56 universities of two states of the Mexican Republic, the Distrito Federal (Federal District) and the Estado de Mexico (State of Mexico), published by the Mexican newspaper Reforma. Among the public and private universities, it is sought to respond to the questioning with respect to in what measure the institutions that charge more by attending their classrooms are better situated in the classification presented, and which is the factor of economic accessibility that implies to attend them. A plan of differentiated flows among the passage from the secondary to the higher education is proposed. An internal typology is utilized for the sub-sector of private institutions: demand absorption, intermediate, and elite. Among others results a clear impact of the inequality is emphasized and social inequity in the possibilities of access to private educational institutions. It is notable that the quantities of private institutions that offer programs of high demand in the traditional professions while the public institutions try to reduce their registration in those areas. The alternatives of those who are rejected in the public institutions face the alternatives to truncate their studies or to continue them in private schools of low cost, absorbent of demand, incurring in greater expenses. Se presenta un análisis de los resultados de una encuesta sobre las mejores universidades 2006-2007 de 15 carreras en 56 universidades de dos entidades de la República mexicana, el Distrito Federal (México) y el Estado de México, publicados por el diario mexicano Reforma. Entre las universidades privadas y públicas se busca responder al cuestionamiento respecto a en qué medida las instituciones que cobran más por asistir a sus aulas quedan mejor situadas en la clasificación presentada y cuál es el factor de accesibilidad económica que implica asistir a ellas. Se propone un esquema de flujos diferenciados entre el pasaje de la educación media a la superior. Se utiliza una tipología interna al subsector de instituciones particulares: de absorción de demanda, intermedias y de elite. Entre otros resultados se destaca un claro impacto de la desigualdad e inequidad social en las posibilidades de acceso a instituciones educativas privadas. Es notable que la cantidad de instituciones privadas que ofrecen programas de alta demanda en las profesiones tradicionales mientras que las instituciones públicas intentan reducir su matrícula en esas áreas. Las alternativas de los rechazados en las instituciones públicas se enfrentan ante las alternativas de truncar sus estudios o continuarlos en escuelas particulares de bajo costo, absorbentes de demanda, incurriendo en mayores gastos. REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2007-05-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/html application/pdf text/html application/pdf https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162 Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2007) Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2007) 1607-4041 spa eng https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162/1034 https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162/280 https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162/1035 https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162/281 Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa
institution REDIE
collection OJS
language spa
eng
format Online
author Estrada Peredo, Nancy Gladys
De la Paz Ortega, Manuel
Gil Antón, Manuel
spellingShingle Estrada Peredo, Nancy Gladys
De la Paz Ortega, Manuel
Gil Antón, Manuel
From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico
author_facet Estrada Peredo, Nancy Gladys
De la Paz Ortega, Manuel
Gil Antón, Manuel
author_sort Estrada Peredo, Nancy Gladys
title From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico
title_short From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico
title_full From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico
title_fullStr From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico
title_full_unstemmed From “Which one Suits you Best?” to “Which one Can you Afford?”: Inequality and Social Inequity in the Access to Higher Education in Mexico
title_sort from “which one suits you best?” to “which one can you afford?”: inequality and social inequity in the access to higher education in mexico
description This paper presents an analysis of the results of a survey on the best universities for the 2006-2007 years, of 15 different careers in 56 universities of two states of the Mexican Republic, the Distrito Federal (Federal District) and the Estado de Mexico (State of Mexico), published by the Mexican newspaper Reforma. Among the public and private universities, it is sought to respond to the questioning with respect to in what measure the institutions that charge more by attending their classrooms are better situated in the classification presented, and which is the factor of economic accessibility that implies to attend them. A plan of differentiated flows among the passage from the secondary to the higher education is proposed. An internal typology is utilized for the sub-sector of private institutions: demand absorption, intermediate, and elite. Among others results a clear impact of the inequality is emphasized and social inequity in the possibilities of access to private educational institutions. It is notable that the quantities of private institutions that offer programs of high demand in the traditional professions while the public institutions try to reduce their registration in those areas. The alternatives of those who are rejected in the public institutions face the alternatives to truncate their studies or to continue them in private schools of low cost, absorbent of demand, incurring in greater expenses.
publisher REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE).
publishDate 2007
url https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/162
_version_ 1715723513004818432

Ejemplares similares