Why Are the Commons Back? The Postcommunity of the Digital Commons
This article aims to theoretically characterize the idea of the commons and to point out the reasons for its boom in recent years. Starting from two of its most widespread definitions, the one exposed in Governing the Commons by Elinor Ostrom and the one developed by Peter Linebaugh in Stop Thief! T...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://culturales.uabc.mx/index.php/Culturales/article/view/790 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | This article aims to theoretically characterize the idea of the commons and to point out the reasons for its boom in recent years. Starting from two of its most widespread definitions, the one exposed in Governing the Commons by Elinor Ostrom and the one developed by Peter Linebaugh in Stop Thief! The Commos, Enclosures and Resistance, it argues that the commons refer to the unique assembly of resources, collectivity and ways in which both are governed. From this characterization, the purpose of this article is to underline that the commons in the digital environment pose a challenge to this definition because they do not presuppose the existence of a scarce good or a community defined beforehand. The article concludes that it is the common doing of a heterogeneous plurality that establishes a “post-idetitarian community” united not so much by what it shares but, paradoxically, by what it does not possess. |
|---|
@UABCInstitucional
UABC_Oficial
@UABC_Oficial
Tel: +52 686 551 82 00
cienciaabierta@uabc.edu.mx