An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty

This paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty. The methodology used begins with the conceptual and operational definition of the domain and is followed through to the analysis of the pilot results to determine...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
Autores principales: De la Orden Hoz, Arturo, Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
פורמט: Online
שפה:spa
יצא לאור: REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2016
גישה מקוונת:https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088
תגים: הוספת תג
אין תגיות, היה/י הראשונ/ה לתייג את הרשומה!
id redie-article-1088
record_format ojs
spelling redie-article-10882020-12-14T19:29:31Z An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty Instrumento para determinar los tipos de evaluación utilizados por los profesores universitarios De la Orden Hoz, Arturo Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio Educación Superior Evaluación del Rendimiento Académico Confiabilidad del Cuestionario Validez de Contenido Validez de Constructo This paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty. The methodology used begins with the conceptual and operational definition of the domain and is followed through to the analysis of the pilot results to determine, on the one hand, the reliability of the questionnaire and each question and, on the other hand, the construct validity. The results of this study provide sufficient evidence to show 1) the validity of the questionnaire content, which shows an acceptable index of agreement according to experts (with Krippendorf’s alpha coefficient greater than 0.7); 2) the global reliability of the questionnaire, equivalent to alpha = 0.87 and the reliability of the questions, between alpha 0.81 and alpha 0.87; 3) the construct validity of the questionnaire; 4) that the factorial structure is not significantly different from the theory used as a basis to establish the questions. The data suggests that the questionnaire is a valid tool and psychometrically sound for its purpose. En este artículo presentamos el proceso de diseño y validación de un cuestionario para determinar los tipos de evaluación que emplean los profesores universitarios. La metodología seguida incluye desde la definición conceptual y operativa del dominio, hasta el análisis de los resultados del piloteo para determinar, por un lado, la confiabilidad del cuestionario y de cada pregunta y, por otro, su validez de constructo. Los resultados de este estudio aportan evidencia suficiente acerca de: 1) la validez de contenido del cuestionario, con un índice aceptable según los expertos (coeficiente alfa de Krippedorff mayor a 0.7); 2) La confiabilidad global del cuestionario equivalente a alfa=0.87 y la confiabilidad de las preguntas entre alfa 0.81 y alfa 0.87; 3) la validez de constructo del cuestionario; 4) la estructura factorial no se aparta significativamente de la teoría que ha servido de base para la especificación de las preguntas. Los datos sugieren que el cuestionario es una herramienta válida y psicométricamente adecuada para su propósito. REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2016-05-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion text/html application/pdf https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088 Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2016) Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2016) 1607-4041 spa https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088/1354 https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088/1442 Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa
institution REDIE
collection OJS
language spa
format Online
author De la Orden Hoz, Arturo
Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
spellingShingle De la Orden Hoz, Arturo
Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
author_facet De la Orden Hoz, Arturo
Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
author_sort De la Orden Hoz, Arturo
title An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_short An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_full An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_fullStr An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_full_unstemmed An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_sort instrument to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty
description This paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty. The methodology used begins with the conceptual and operational definition of the domain and is followed through to the analysis of the pilot results to determine, on the one hand, the reliability of the questionnaire and each question and, on the other hand, the construct validity. The results of this study provide sufficient evidence to show 1) the validity of the questionnaire content, which shows an acceptable index of agreement according to experts (with Krippendorf’s alpha coefficient greater than 0.7); 2) the global reliability of the questionnaire, equivalent to alpha = 0.87 and the reliability of the questions, between alpha 0.81 and alpha 0.87; 3) the construct validity of the questionnaire; 4) that the factorial structure is not significantly different from the theory used as a basis to establish the questions. The data suggests that the questionnaire is a valid tool and psychometrically sound for its purpose.
publisher REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE).
publishDate 2016
url https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088
_version_ 1715723545851461632