Assessing EFL university students' writing: A study of score reliability

The assessment of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing is a complex activity that is subject to human judgment, which makes it difficult to achieve a fair, accurate and reliable assessment of student writing (Pearson, 2004: 117; Hamp-Lyons, 2003). This study reports on the variability that ex...

全面介绍

Guardado en:
书目详细资料
Autores principales: González, Elsa Fernanda, Trejo, Nelly Paulina, Roux, Ruth
格式: Online
语言:eng
出版: REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2017
在线阅读:https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/928
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
实物特征
总结:The assessment of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing is a complex activity that is subject to human judgment, which makes it difficult to achieve a fair, accurate and reliable assessment of student writing (Pearson, 2004: 117; Hamp-Lyons, 2003). This study reports on the variability that exists between the analytical grades that 11 Mexican EFL university teachers awarded to five writing samples. It describes the raters’ views on writing assessment and their use of analytical scoring rubrics. Data obtained from the grades awarded to each paper, and a background questionnaire, suggested that great variability was found between grades, and raters differed in their levels of leniency and severity, suggesting that having similar backgrounds and using the same rubric are not enough to ensure rater reliability. Participants’ perceptions were found to be similar in terms of the use of analytical rubrics.