Assessing EFL university students' writing: A study of score reliability

The assessment of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing is a complex activity that is subject to human judgment, which makes it difficult to achieve a fair, accurate and reliable assessment of student writing (Pearson, 2004: 117; Hamp-Lyons, 2003). This study reports on the variability that ex...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autoři: González, Elsa Fernanda, Trejo, Nelly Paulina, Roux, Ruth
Médium: Online
Jazyk:eng
Vydáno: REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2017
On-line přístup:https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/928
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:The assessment of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing is a complex activity that is subject to human judgment, which makes it difficult to achieve a fair, accurate and reliable assessment of student writing (Pearson, 2004: 117; Hamp-Lyons, 2003). This study reports on the variability that exists between the analytical grades that 11 Mexican EFL university teachers awarded to five writing samples. It describes the raters’ views on writing assessment and their use of analytical scoring rubrics. Data obtained from the grades awarded to each paper, and a background questionnaire, suggested that great variability was found between grades, and raters differed in their levels of leniency and severity, suggesting that having similar backgrounds and using the same rubric are not enough to ensure rater reliability. Participants’ perceptions were found to be similar in terms of the use of analytical rubrics.