An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty

This paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty. The methodology used begins with the conceptual and operational definition of the domain and is followed through to the analysis of the pilot results to determine...

Disgrifiad llawn

Wedi'i Gadw mewn:

Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Prif Awduron:	De la Orden Hoz, Arturo, Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
Fformat:	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Iaith:	spa
Cyhoeddwyd:	REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). 2016
Pynciau:	Educación Superior Evaluación del Rendimiento Académico Confiabilidad del Cuestionario Validez de Contenido Validez de Constructo
Mynediad Ar-lein:	https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088
Tagiau:	Ychwanegu Tag Dim Tagiau, Byddwch y cyntaf i dagio'r cofnod hwn!

id	repositorioinstitucional-20.500.12930-6227
record_format	dspace
spelling	repositorioinstitucional-20.500.12930-62272023-05-09T15:04:31Z An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty Instrumento para determinar los tipos de evaluación utilizados por los profesores universitarios De la Orden Hoz, Arturo Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio Educación Superior Evaluación del Rendimiento Académico Confiabilidad del Cuestionario Validez de Contenido Validez de Constructo This paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty. The methodology used begins with the conceptual and operational definition of the domain and is followed through to the analysis of the pilot results to determine, on the one hand, the reliability of the questionnaire and each question and, on the other hand, the construct validity. The results of this study provide sufficient evidence to show 1) the validity of the questionnaire content, which shows an acceptable index of agreement according to experts (with Krippendorf’s alpha coefficient greater than 0.7); 2) the global reliability of the questionnaire, equivalent to alpha = 0.87 and the reliability of the questions, between alpha 0.81 and alpha 0.87; 3) the construct validity of the questionnaire; 4) that the factorial structure is not significantly different from the theory used as a basis to establish the questions. The data suggests that the questionnaire is a valid tool and psychometrically sound for its purpose. En este artículo presentamos el proceso de diseño y validación de un cuestionario para determinar los tipos de evaluación que emplean los profesores universitarios. La metodología seguida incluye desde la definición conceptual y operativa del dominio, hasta el análisis de los resultados del piloteo para determinar, por un lado, la confiabilidad del cuestionario y de cada pregunta y, por otro, su validez de constructo. Los resultados de este estudio aportan evidencia suficiente acerca de: 1) la validez de contenido del cuestionario, con un índice aceptable según los expertos (coeficiente alfa de Krippedorff mayor a 0.7); 2) La confiabilidad global del cuestionario equivalente a alfa=0.87 y la confiabilidad de las preguntas entre alfa 0.81 y alfa 0.87; 3) la validez de constructo del cuestionario; 4) la estructura factorial no se aparta significativamente de la teoría que ha servido de base para la especificación de las preguntas. Los datos sugieren que el cuestionario es una herramienta válida y psicométricamente adecuada para su propósito. 2016-05-02 2021-06-03T03:08:13Z 2021-06-03T03:08:13Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12930/6227 spa https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088/1354 https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088/1442 Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa text/html application/pdf REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE). Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2016) Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2016) 1607-4041
institution	Repositorio Institucional
collection	DSpace
language	spa
topic	Educación Superior Evaluación del Rendimiento Académico Confiabilidad del Cuestionario Validez de Contenido Validez de Constructo
spellingShingle	Educación Superior Evaluación del Rendimiento Académico Confiabilidad del Cuestionario Validez de Contenido Validez de Constructo De la Orden Hoz, Arturo Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
description	This paper presents the design and validation process of a questionnaire to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty. The methodology used begins with the conceptual and operational definition of the domain and is followed through to the analysis of the pilot results to determine, on the one hand, the reliability of the questionnaire and each question and, on the other hand, the construct validity. The results of this study provide sufficient evidence to show 1) the validity of the questionnaire content, which shows an acceptable index of agreement according to experts (with Krippendorf’s alpha coefficient greater than 0.7); 2) the global reliability of the questionnaire, equivalent to alpha = 0.87 and the reliability of the questions, between alpha 0.81 and alpha 0.87; 3) the construct validity of the questionnaire; 4) that the factorial structure is not significantly different from the theory used as a basis to establish the questions. The data suggests that the questionnaire is a valid tool and psychometrically sound for its purpose.
format	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
author	De la Orden Hoz, Arturo Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
author_facet	De la Orden Hoz, Arturo Pimienta Prieto, Julio Herminio
author_sort	De la Orden Hoz, Arturo
title	An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_short	An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_full	An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_fullStr	An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_full_unstemmed	An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty
title_sort	instrument to determine the types of assessment used by members of faculty
publisher	REDIE es una publicación del Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo Educativo (IIDE).
publishDate	2016
url	https://redie.uabc.mx/index.php/redie/article/view/1088
_version_	1792608718146240512

An Instrument to Determine the Types of Assessment Used by members of Faculty

Eitemau Tebyg

Síguenos en: