Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception

To evaluate the growth of our journal, Ciencias Marinas, over the years since its inclusion for indexing in 2 major international databases, we performed a joint analysis of 8 bibliometric indicators: impact factor, source normalized impact per paper (SNIP), CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), ci...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Huerta, Miguel Angel, De Jesus, Melba, Cabello-Pasini, Alejandro
Formato: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Idioma:eng
Publicado em: Iniversidad Autónoma de Baja California 2019
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/2993
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id repositorioinstitucional-20.500.12930-7557
record_format dspace
spelling repositorioinstitucional-20.500.12930-75572023-05-09T14:30:57Z Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception Análisis bibliométrico de la revista Ciencias Marinas a 45 años de su fundación Huerta, Miguel Angel De Jesus, Melba Cabello-Pasini, Alejandro Ciencias Marinas impact factor scientific community publication Ciencias Marinas factor de impacto comunidad científica publicación To evaluate the growth of our journal, Ciencias Marinas, over the years since its inclusion for indexing in 2 major international databases, we performed a joint analysis of 8 bibliometric indicators: impact factor, source normalized impact per paper (SNIP), CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), cites per document, total cites, percent international collaboration, and h-index. In general, 6 of the 8 indicators suggest that growth for Ciencias Marinas can be qualified somewhere between satisfactory and good. The other 2 indicators, SNIP (1999–2017) and SJR (2010–2017), did not show significant changes for the time period analyzed. Se aplicaron ocho diferentes indicadores bibliométricos para evaluar el desarrollo de la revista Ciencias Marinas (RCM) a través de los años cubiertos por cuatro diferentes bases de datos: factor de impacto, fuente normalizada de impacto por artículo (SNIP), CiteScore, SCImago journal rank (SJR), citas por documento, citas totales, porcentaje de colaboración internacional, índice H). Los resultados obtenidos en base a seis de los ocho indicadores sugieren que en general el desarrollo de la RCM podría calificarse de satisfactorio a bueno, excepto en lo que se refiere a los indicadores SNIP (1999-2017) y SJR (2010-2017), que no mostraron cambios importantes a lo largo del período de tiempo evaluado. 2019-03-31 2021-06-03T03:55:40Z 2021-06-03T03:55:40Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/2993 10.7773/cm.v45i1.2993 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12930/7557 eng https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/2993/420420475 Copyright (c) 2019 Ciencias Marinas application/pdf Iniversidad Autónoma de Baja California Ciencias Marinas; Vol. 45 No. 1 (2019); 17–22 Ciencias Marinas; Vol. 45 Núm. 1 (2019); 17–22 2395-9053 0185-3880
institution Repositorio Institucional
collection DSpace
language eng
topic Ciencias Marinas
impact factor
scientific community
publication
Ciencias Marinas
factor de impacto
comunidad científica
publicación
spellingShingle Ciencias Marinas
impact factor
scientific community
publication
Ciencias Marinas
factor de impacto
comunidad científica
publicación
Huerta, Miguel Angel
De Jesus, Melba
Cabello-Pasini, Alejandro
Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception
description To evaluate the growth of our journal, Ciencias Marinas, over the years since its inclusion for indexing in 2 major international databases, we performed a joint analysis of 8 bibliometric indicators: impact factor, source normalized impact per paper (SNIP), CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), cites per document, total cites, percent international collaboration, and h-index. In general, 6 of the 8 indicators suggest that growth for Ciencias Marinas can be qualified somewhere between satisfactory and good. The other 2 indicators, SNIP (1999–2017) and SJR (2010–2017), did not show significant changes for the time period analyzed.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
author Huerta, Miguel Angel
De Jesus, Melba
Cabello-Pasini, Alejandro
author_facet Huerta, Miguel Angel
De Jesus, Melba
Cabello-Pasini, Alejandro
author_sort Huerta, Miguel Angel
title Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception
title_short Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception
title_full Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception
title_fullStr Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric analysis for Ciencias Marinas 45 years after its inception
title_sort bibliometric analysis for ciencias marinas 45 years after its inception
publisher Iniversidad Autónoma de Baja California
publishDate 2019
url https://www.cienciasmarinas.com.mx/index.php/cmarinas/article/view/2993
_version_ 1792610476223365120