Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education

Whether from an ethical perspective or under the guidelines of social behavior, social values imply a series of contents that, under different rationalities or paradigmatic intentionalities, conform an integrating meaning of individual worth in the world. The purpose of this article is to establish...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mungaray Lagarda, Marcela
Formato: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Lenguaje:spa
Publicado: Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://ref.uabc.mx/ojs/index.php/ref/article/view/220
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id repositorioinstitucional-20.500.12930-6569
record_format dspace
spelling repositorioinstitucional-20.500.12930-65692023-05-09T17:04:23Z Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education Los paradigmas científicos frente a los retos del significado axiológico en la educación Mungaray Lagarda, Marcela values axiology paradigm education. Philosophy ethics character virtue Anthropology Intellectual life valores axiología paradigmas educación. Filosofía Ética Carácter Virtud Antropología La vida intelectual Whether from an ethical perspective or under the guidelines of social behavior, social values imply a series of contents that, under different rationalities or paradigmatic intentionalities, conform an integrating meaning of individual worth in the world. The purpose of this article is to establish that the full range of meanings in this field and consequently, the confusion regarding formative statements of value, can be approached through the comprehension of the different paradigmatic fields on which science constructs its own areas of knowledge and intrinsically or extrinsically assigns values to different cognitive processes. Conciliating paradigms is not easy as each body of knowledge implies an understanding of the world under certain cognitive structures, each with its own set of values. These are not necessarily universal insofar as the object of knowledge in itself includes or excludes fields of values by which the scientific statement takes on meaning. Therefore, the theory of value generates comprehensive structures that will be viewed from three paradigmatic perspectives: empirical-analitical, structural-hermenutic and critical-sistemic. Los valores desde la ética o desde las pautas de comportamiento social han implicado una serie de contenidos que, bajo distintas racionalidades o intencionalidades paradigmáticas, conforman un sentido integrador del valor del ser en el mundo. El objetivo de este texto es fundamentar que la polisemia en este campo y, por ende, la confusión de los planteamientos formativos respecto al valor, se pueden abordar desde la comprensión de los distintos campos paradigmáticos en que la ciencia construye sus campos de conocimiento y atribuye valores intrínseca y extrínsecamente a los procesos cognitivos. La conciliación entre los paradigmas no es cosa fácil ya que cada cuerpo de conocimientos implica la comprensión del mundo bajo estructuras cognitivas que dan cuenta de sus propios valores no necesariamente universales, dado que la presentación de sus objetos de conocimiento convoca ya la inclusión o exclusión de un campo valoral donde la cientificidad de cada planteamiento cobra sentido. La teoría del valor genera, pues, estructuras comprehensivas que serán planteadas desde tres ámbitos paradigmáticos: empírico-analítico, estructural-hermenéutico y crítico-sistémico. Palabras clave: valores, axiología, paradigmas, educación. 2005-01-01 2021-06-03T03:34:51Z 2021-06-03T03:34:51Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Understanding the different paradigmatic fields in which science builds their fields of knowledge and attributes intrinsic values and extrinsically cognitive processes Comprensión de los distintos campos paradigmáticos en que la ciencia construye sus campos de conocimiento y atribuye valores intrínseca y extrínsecamente a los procesos cognitivos https://ref.uabc.mx/ojs/index.php/ref/article/view/220 10.21670/ref.2005.11.a03 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12930/6569 spa https://ref.uabc.mx/ojs/index.php/ref/article/view/220/384 https://ref.uabc.mx/ojs/index.php/ref/article/view/220/769 Derechos de autor 2014 Estudios Fronterizos Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades application/pdf text/html Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Estudios Fronterizos Revista; Vol. 6 No. 11 (2005); 57-73 Estudios Fronterizos; Vol. 6 Núm. 11 (2005); 57-73 2395-9134 0187-6961
institution Repositorio Institucional
collection DSpace
language spa
topic values
axiology
paradigm
education.
Philosophy
ethics
character
virtue
Anthropology
Intellectual life
valores
axiología
paradigmas
educación.
Filosofía
Ética
Carácter
Virtud
Antropología
La vida intelectual
spellingShingle values
axiology
paradigm
education.
Philosophy
ethics
character
virtue
Anthropology
Intellectual life
valores
axiología
paradigmas
educación.
Filosofía
Ética
Carácter
Virtud
Antropología
La vida intelectual
Mungaray Lagarda, Marcela
Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
description Whether from an ethical perspective or under the guidelines of social behavior, social values imply a series of contents that, under different rationalities or paradigmatic intentionalities, conform an integrating meaning of individual worth in the world. The purpose of this article is to establish that the full range of meanings in this field and consequently, the confusion regarding formative statements of value, can be approached through the comprehension of the different paradigmatic fields on which science constructs its own areas of knowledge and intrinsically or extrinsically assigns values to different cognitive processes. Conciliating paradigms is not easy as each body of knowledge implies an understanding of the world under certain cognitive structures, each with its own set of values. These are not necessarily universal insofar as the object of knowledge in itself includes or excludes fields of values by which the scientific statement takes on meaning. Therefore, the theory of value generates comprehensive structures that will be viewed from three paradigmatic perspectives: empirical-analitical, structural-hermenutic and critical-sistemic.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
author Mungaray Lagarda, Marcela
author_facet Mungaray Lagarda, Marcela
author_sort Mungaray Lagarda, Marcela
title Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
title_short Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
title_full Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
title_fullStr Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
title_full_unstemmed Scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
title_sort scientific paradigms facing the challenges of axiological meaning in education
publisher Universidad Autónoma de Baja California
publishDate 2005
url https://ref.uabc.mx/ojs/index.php/ref/article/view/220
_version_ 1792610086642778112